Hm, it's a good draft. I already have a list of things I'd like to see done to it.
It could benefit from some sectioning. I think we should make clear distinctions between the problem, proper style choices, and maybe a section on tabs vs. spaces, so that we can lay out a table of contents.
I'm sure that dwks didn't intend this to be the case but sections of the article sound a bit patronizing and et cetera. To pull a quote, "But how do we fix it? It's not difficult--you do not need to be afraid at all." Unnecessarily rude! Like other archives of information, we should strive to be objective and avoid use of loaded words.
No unnecessarily capitalized phrases: we should be using bold or italics for emphasis in lieu of "screaming."
I'll get started on what I think needs to be done to the article when I find free time (I'd need to learn a lot before I know how it works). If there are any skilled individuals who understand how wikimedia works already, maybe they can get started?
