1. How can i change the warning level in Dev C++?
2. How can i update the background gcc compiler with the latest one?
1. How can i change the warning level in Dev C++?
2. How can i update the background gcc compiler with the latest one?
I think it's in Tools->Compiler Options. There might be an option for warning level there. If not, add "-W -Wall" to "extra compiler options".1. How can i change the warning level in Dev C++?
That would be slightly more complicated. I've never done it, but since you can configure the compiler that Dev-C++ uses, I'm sure you could download the latest GCC, instead it where you choose, and instruct Dev-C++ to use it.2. How can i update the background gcc compiler with the latest one?
dwk
Seek and ye shall find. quaere et invenies.
"Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it." -- Alan Perlis
"Testing can only prove the presence of bugs, not their absence." -- Edsger Dijkstra
"The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing." -- John Powell
Other boards: DaniWeb, TPS
Unofficial Wiki FAQ: cpwiki.sf.net
My website: http://dwks.theprogrammingsite.com/
Projects: codeform, xuni, atlantis, nort, etc.
The MinGW wiki comes with an article on what to install and how:
http://www.mingw.org/MinGWiki/index....3124da3e143e84
The only thing you may want to consider is that the versions available at the download webpage of the main website are the latest working release. This also means some are somewhat old. Candidate versions are excellent choices for about all modules. So you may prefer to download from sourceforge at http://sourceforge.net/project/showf...?group_id=2435
My advise is to first download from the main website according to what you read on the wiki. Don't install anything. Then go to sourceforge and replace those modules you downloaded with those found in the Candidate header. Also download the GDB 6.3.2 Snapshot of GDB and MSYS. Much, much better than the ones provided in Current.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
This is what I have on my mingw downloads folder:
binutils-2.17.50-20060824-1.tar.gz
gcc-core-3.4.5-20060117-1.tar.gz
gcc-g++-3.4.5-20060117-1.tar.gz
mingw32-make-3.81-1.tar.gz
mingw-runtime-3.10.tar.gz
mingw-utils-0.3.tar.gz
MSYS-1.0.10.exe
msysDTK-1.0.1.exe
w32api-3.7.tar.gz
gdb-6.3-2.exe
Find those in sourceforge and I believe you will have the latest instalment of MinGW. Then it is just a matter of keeping an eye on the news box on the main mingw webpage.
EDIT: Oh... You need to change some of the executables dev-c++ calls. Tools menu->Compiler Options->Programs tab and then:
gcc is mingw32-gcc.exe
g++ is mingw32-g++.exe
make is mingw32-make.exe
Last edited by Mario F.; 09-17-2006 at 08:39 AM.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
maybe not, but it's definately not "Computer questions not related to C/C++/C# programming" and "Questions specific to C++ Programming" doesn't dictate that it must be directly related to the language itself... IMO it was fine where it was...Originally Posted by Ken Fitlike
Join is in our Unofficial Cprog IRC channel
Server: irc.phoenixradio.org
Channel: #Tech
Team Cprog Folding@Home: Team #43476
Download it Here
Detailed Stats Here
More Detailed Stats
52 Members so far, are YOU a member?
Current team score: 1223226 (ranked 374 of 45152)
The CBoard team is doing better than 99.16% of the other teams
Top 5 Members: Xterria(518175), pianorain(118517), Bennet(64957), JaWiB(55610), alphaoide(44374)
Last Updated on: Wed, 30 Aug, 2006 @ 2:30 PM EDT
Strange... My answer to a completely different thread is included here. The OP was asking about installing Dev-C++. I'm pretty sure...
EDIT: nevermind. It's the second question.
Last edited by Mario F.; 09-18-2006 at 02:36 PM.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
how did I know this would be your response... oh that's right, publicly questioning authority is bad... it leads to... oh no... improvements!Originally Posted by Ken Fitlike
Join is in our Unofficial Cprog IRC channel
Server: irc.phoenixradio.org
Channel: #Tech
Team Cprog Folding@Home: Team #43476
Download it Here
Detailed Stats Here
More Detailed Stats
52 Members so far, are YOU a member?
Current team score: 1223226 (ranked 374 of 45152)
The CBoard team is doing better than 99.16% of the other teams
Top 5 Members: Xterria(518175), pianorain(118517), Bennet(64957), JaWiB(55610), alphaoide(44374)
Last Updated on: Wed, 30 Aug, 2006 @ 2:30 PM EDT
what politcal agenda? I saw something I thought was wrong and pointed it out... you're the one that took it personally...Originally Posted by Ken Fitlike
there was never a need for a response in the first place... as I said... I just saw something, had an opinion, and let it be known.Originally Posted by Ken Flitlike
This is really why I'm replying... in hopes of getting this closed... this thread took an ugly turn and needs to die.Originally Posted by Ken Flitlike
I apologize if I offended you, it wasn't meant as a personal attack of any kind. I disagreed with something that was done, and I brought it up. My intention was to see if people agreed or disagreed with my position. I hold nothing against you, and quite honestly did not even look at the name of who it was moved by before posting my opinion.
If you feel the need to delete any or all of my posts in this thread, please do so.
Join is in our Unofficial Cprog IRC channel
Server: irc.phoenixradio.org
Channel: #Tech
Team Cprog Folding@Home: Team #43476
Download it Here
Detailed Stats Here
More Detailed Stats
52 Members so far, are YOU a member?
Current team score: 1223226 (ranked 374 of 45152)
The CBoard team is doing better than 99.16% of the other teams
Top 5 Members: Xterria(518175), pianorain(118517), Bennet(64957), JaWiB(55610), alphaoide(44374)
Last Updated on: Wed, 30 Aug, 2006 @ 2:30 PM EDT
Not.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.