What do you mean? i still exists. I'm just saying that you could use my for loop instead of your for loop. Mine makes use of only one counting variable, pos, whilst yours uses pos as well as ptr. You don't need both counters -- one will suffice.
What do you mean? i still exists. I'm just saying that you could use my for loop instead of your for loop. Mine makes use of only one counting variable, pos, whilst yours uses pos as well as ptr. You don't need both counters -- one will suffice.
dwk
Seek and ye shall find. quaere et invenies.
"Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it." -- Alan Perlis
"Testing can only prove the presence of bugs, not their absence." -- Edsger Dijkstra
"The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing." -- John Powell
Other boards: DaniWeb, TPS
Unofficial Wiki FAQ: cpwiki.sf.net
My website: http://dwks.theprogrammingsite.com/
Projects: codeform, xuni, atlantis, nort, etc.
