The MPAA and NATO (I'd be really surprised to find out this acronym was created after the other NATO) are the "sponsors" of the rating system, so it makes sense that they'd have a stranglehold on what happens with it.
The MPAA and NATO (I'd be really surprised to find out this acronym was created after the other NATO) are the "sponsors" of the rating system, so it makes sense that they'd have a stranglehold on what happens with it.
-Govtcheez
[email protected]
Found this. Except for what appears to be a clearly identified opinon it seems pretty good.
http://www.dove.org/news/uplink/hu0504.htm
Excerpts:
If a film was never submitted for a rating, the label "NR" (Not Rated) is often used, however "NR" is not an official MPAA classification. This designation makes it difficult for a movie to get into the theaters, since NATO (National Association of Theater Owners) agreed to honor the MPAA ratings to the exclusion of any movie that does not carry an official designation. Films that have not yet received MPAA classification are often advertised under the banner, "This film is not yet rated.” The MPAA Website is: http://www.MPAA .orgThe rating system is entirely voluntary, with no legal recourse. However, MPAA member studios are expected to submit all of their theatrical releases for rating. Few mainstream producers are willing to bypass the rating system due to potential negative effects on revenues. Therefore, the system has a de facto compulsory status.
I was at Great Lakes Crossing at that time.Originally Posted by Govtcheez
From Ukraine with love!
Internationally known – widely respected
- Digitally yourz -
