"If this were read to the people of New York they would laugh at anyone telling such a thing. Yet apparently the people in Jerusalem were so gullible that they would beloved that the Biblical account of Jesus tomb and the Guards that guarded it were in fact believed even though it did not happen."
That's your proof?
"Had the tomb not been empty the idea of retrieving the body of Jesus must of slipped the Jewish and Roman authorities as well as any skeptics"
Why would the Romans have bothered?
This is all complete conjecture, conjecture != proof.
It also makes a load assumptions that i have to see ratified by evidence:
Was Chrsitianity realy so much of a force back then, to justify the Romans diggging up a tomb? Possibly but i'm dubious given that the bible wasn't even written for another 50 odd years.
Were their really guards guarding his tomb? Was he really even put in a tomb? Oh wait i know it says in the bible!
One of my friends is a theology student, he got a first, he spent his entire degree studying ancient religious texts, hes doing a masters on the dead sea scrolls. He thinks it's all bollocks.
In fact EVEN the theology students who DO believe in God seem to think that the major religions are all bollocks, what does that tell you? Even the ones who do believe do not think there is evidence for the ressurection.
That's un-biased teaching of all the religions in light of real evidence btw. Not your Christian history.