A = 1, B = infinity.
These are sets of elements of the universe not numbers.
You cannot speak of any element, event, or some atom's position,
whatever, that differentiate god's existance. Does god need water? No, he's all powerful. Does god need logic? No, he's all powerful.

No it, doesn't mathematics doesn't talk about "existance" at all.
Yes it does but you have to define where it exist. Why did
does 2 exist. Because we can prove that if 0 exist and
1 exist then if we define 2 = 1 + 1 we can then prove that
2 is different than 1 and different than 0. Thus it exist in
the mathematical realm.

NOT that we won't be able to find EVIDENCE for objects. They are totally unrelated.
No, just no evidence that contradicts god's existance.

My response was was given assuming "hold on to old beliefs" meant those concerning god and such. If thats not what you meant then what did you mean?
Not necessarly god but any belief such as abortion.

Obviously, the idea that murder is "wrong" makes sense today whereas the idea of an all-powerful god existing makes little sense today
We haven't had any new evidence of god,
there is only evidence that some views on religion are flawed. In order for something to make "sense" you base it on previous morals or events. Problem that I see now is that logic itself is defined by people and there interactions with the physical world.