Problem with settgin a callback under directshow

[abachler]

1>..\Include\CDirectShowCamera.cpp(224) : error C3867: 'CDirectShowCamera::BufferCB': function call missing argument list; use '&CDirectShowCamera::BufferCB' to create a pointer to member

this->pGrabber->SetCallback(this->BufferCB , 1);

keep returning errors, here is the callback function, which is implimented as a member function

HRESULT CDirectShowCamera::BufferCB(double SampleTime , BYTE* pImage , long BufferLen){ 
 // snip irrelevant guts
   return S_OK;
 } 

except if I add the ampersand it gives this error

 this->pGrabber->SetCallback(&CDirectShowCamera::BufferCB , 1);

1>..\Include\CDirectShowCamera.cpp(224) : error C2664: 'ISampleGrabber::SetCallback' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'HRESULT (__thiscall CDirectShowCamera::* )(double,BYTE *,long)' to 'ISampleGrabberCB *'


which makes even less sense. Obviously I need to be able to call this callback function, but I need it to know what instance of CDIrectShowCamera it is handling, so that it can add the sampels to the appropriate buffer. There will be more than one instance of the class operating simultaneously. I know im probably missing somethign realyl obvious.

[Cactus_Hugger]

Never worked with these, but: "You can't convert a member-function pointer to a ISampleGrabberCB *" -- is what that error says... where are you getting lost?

Seems to me you should derive from ISampleGrabberCB, and implement that interface, instantiate it, and pass the instance. The derived class could hold whatever data you needed it to, such as a pointer to your CDIrectShowCamera. No different than predicates to C++'s standard functions, such as sort(), really.

[Sebastiani]

Right, assuming you've derived the class from ISampleGrabberCB and overloaded the BufferCB or SampleCB functions, you'll just need to pass a pointer to the object itself, ie:

this->pGrabber->SetCallback(this, 1);

[abachler]

I tried making a derived class but the compiler pukes because there is no appropriate constructor type in the base class, and when I tried overloading the constructor it puked again saying constructors are not allowed a return type, which didnt make sense since the constructor had no return type. I think im starting to see why pointers to member functions are not used very often.

I'm rethinking my strategy to possibly avoid pointers to member functions. It late and I think im messing up on implimenting the ISampleGrabberCB interface, so ill get soem sleep adn try again tomorrow.

[Sebastiani]

>> I tried making a derived class but the compiler pukes because there is no appropriate constructor type in the base class, and when I tried overloading the constructor it puked again

Well, you can't override a constructor. Can you post a compilable example?

[laserlight]

I tried making a derived class but the compiler pukes because there is no appropriate constructor type in the base class

If I understand this particular hurdle correctly, you could invoke the appropriate base class constructor in the derived class constructor's initialisation list.

[abachler]

>> I tried making a derived class but the compiler pukes because there is no appropriate constructor type in the base class, and when I tried overloading the constructor it puked again

Well, you can't override a constructor. Can you post a compilable example?

The last compilable example I have doesnt have any of this code in it. It's using the GetCurrentBuffer() method, which I want to improve so that I get every image, with no duplicates. All im trying to do is add the callback so I can buffer each sample and then ill rewrite the CDirectShowCamera::GetCurrentImage() member function to retrieve images from the buffer instead of from GetCurrentBuffer(). This is the relevant code from the constructor function in the last compilable version,

  this->pGrabber->SetCallback(NULL , 1);
  this->pGrabber->SetBufferSamples(TRUE);

  this->Stage = 17;
  hr = this->pControl->Run();
  if(FAILED(hr)) return;

  this->Stage = 0xffffffff;
  this->Initialized = TRUE;
  return;

I cant post the whole class as its quite lengthy, this is actually the last thing it does before running the graph