Thread: Linux software installer recommendations

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Mountaintop, Pa
    Posts
    1,058

    Linux software installer recommendations

    I'm looking for a Linux software installer that is simple and easy to use. RPM which seems to be the most popular also seems to be a little too complex. I don't want to spend my time reading documentation on how to use and tweak an installer. It's more important to me to devote this time to the development of my apps.

    It will be used for installing a commercial app. So, I don't want to get involved with licensing fees since I just barely break even on the application.

    Can anybody make any installer recommendations?

  2. #2
    Cat without Hat CornedBee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    8,895
    I don't have any recommendations, but consider this: RPM works on 3 distributions (SuSE, RedHat/Fedora, Mandriva). DEB works on 2 (Debian, Ubuntu/Kubuntu). Fringe distros use even different formats.
    But RPMs of different distros often need to be slightly different.

    You could look at how other companies do it. Most of them, I think, just write custom install scripts.
    All the buzzt!
    CornedBee

    "There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
    - Flon's Law

  3. #3
    {Jaxom,Imriel,Liam}'s Dad Kennedy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    1,065
    Slackware uses the old rusty-trusty tgz files.

  4. #4
    System Novice siavoshkc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tehran
    Posts
    1,246
    Anaconda is the installer of Fedora. Maybe it can be found seperately. I don't know.
    Learn C++ (C++ Books, C Books, FAQ, Forum Search)
    Code painter latest version on sourceforge DOWNLOAD NOW!
    Download FSB Data Integrity Tester.
    Siavosh K C

  5. #5

  6. #6
    Crazy Fool Perspective's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,640
    Use autotools if you want general portability accross linux distros.

  7. #7
    Dump Truck Internet valis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    357
    Maybe SMART or autopackage

  8. #8
    Cat without Hat CornedBee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    8,895
    autotools isn't exactly a tool for installation of binary packages, though ...
    All the buzzt!
    CornedBee

    "There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
    - Flon's Law

  9. #9
    User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    499
    Quote Originally Posted by CornedBee
    autotools isn't exactly a tool for installation of binary packages, though ...
    Neither is Portage... what I like about it is that it has a USE variable that you can set in /etc/make.conf or in the command-line for compiler flags, and that everything just compiles without any hassle.

  10. #10
    Dump Truck Internet valis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    357
    ebuild and emerge are tools though, and they comprise a way of installing binary or source distributed software, autotools is just a way to easily run a few commands to build something with lots of checking and the like.

  11. #11
    Crazy Fool Perspective's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,640
    Quote Originally Posted by CornedBee
    autotools isn't exactly a tool for installation of binary packages, though ...
    Sure it is, you just have to build the package before you install it

  12. #12
    pwns nooblars
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portland, Or
    Posts
    1,094
    I like my rusty and trusty slackpacks (.tgz).

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Mountaintop, Pa
    Posts
    1,058
    Thanx all for the info. It'll be a tough decision.

    Thanx again!

  14. #14
    Registered User Jaqui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    416
    just one little item.
    according to the Linux Standards Base, RPM packages are the standard packages for binary instalation of software.
    all the other install tool MUST support rpm packages to be standards compliant.
    [ right now, only debian's package management tools also support rpm. this means debian, ubuntu, kubuntu, edubuntu, gnoppix, knoppix ( most single cdrom distros ) also support rpm, since the majority of distros are based on debian. debian has the largest repositories of software out of all the distros. ]
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Henager
    If the average user can put a CD in and boot the system and follow the prompts, he can install and use Linux. If he can't do that simple task, he doesn't need to be around technology.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Thinking of upgrading to linux...
    By Yarin in forum General Discussions
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 07-24-2009, 11:40 AM
  2. Some common Linux Questions???
    By code2d in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-28-2006, 02:17 AM
  3. Linux Version reccomendation
    By Pobega in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 10-05-2006, 06:48 PM
  4. Linux for Windows!
    By Strut in forum Linux Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-25-2002, 11:36 AM
  5. Linux? Windows Xp?
    By VooDoo in forum Linux Programming
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-31-2002, 08:18 AM