All-inclusive. Monitor, Windows, keyboard,... they were quite proud of it, repeated the price several times. That's why I remember it.
But it's a new computer. And it has a brand name on the box. My app was written when average comp had 8 or 16 MB of RAM so now when I look at it I can see it uses between 8 and 20MB as it runs. That's why it was designed to use cache on disk. If I were writing it in this century cached data would have been kept in memory. Well, this is maybe the first thing I'll do this week - move the cache from disk to memory.
But this is the only report that recreates the cache from scratch on each run. I have other reports where cache is only updated on each run. They will continue suffering when a lot of cached records are invalid for some reason. I would really like to somehow recognize computers that are incredibly bad.