Thread: Windows backup solution

  1. #1
    Officially An Architect brewbuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    7,396

    Windows backup solution

    I am trying to get away from my current flaky backup strategy based on the built-in Windows 7 backup system. Problem is, I can't seem to find software that doesn't suck. A good local backup method would have the following traits:

    1. No proprietary data formats
    2. Easy retrieval of single files
    3. Ability to back up files that are currently opened
    4. Incremental backup capability
    5. Fully validated
    6. Robust error recovery
    7. Informative reporting
    8. Arbitrary scheduling
    9. Support multiple volumes being backed up

    What do you folks use? I'm not really interested in cloud solutions for multiple reasons.
    Code:
    //try
    //{
    	if (a) do { f( b); } while(1);
    	else   do { f(!b); } while(1);
    //}

  2. #2
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    A bit hard to get everything on that list. Number 1 pratically rules out most of the commercial solutions, if not all. But, by god, I can understand why you want it!

    For a long while I've used Cobian Backup. A freeware backup solution that never let me down. It covers all your points except for 6 and 7 -- and I'm not sure of 5.

    Over an year ago I completely changed my backup strategy (if that's what I can call it now) and have been using Create Synchronicity ever since, which offers very little of what you ask.
    Last edited by Mario F.; 12-22-2012 at 05:58 PM.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  3. #3
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Tom's Hardware did a recent article on IT tools and they recommend Areca Backup. I didn't check much of it, but I think you would like to know.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  4. #4
    Officially An Architect brewbuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    7,396
    Thanks, Mario. I did check out Cobian Backup and it looks at least stable and has successfully done an incremental backup for two days in a row. It might be what I need, for now.

    I'm actually planning to build a storage-tower/firewall box for the house in the next couple of months, so it needs to back up to a network volume. I assume it can do that, right?
    Code:
    //try
    //{
    	if (a) do { f( b); } while(1);
    	else   do { f(!b); } while(1);
    //}

  5. #5
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Yeah, it can. It will work off the bat if you use the program normally. But If you end up using the program as a service make sure that in the Options screen it is set to convert all network paths to UNC paths.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-19-2012, 07:15 PM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-18-2011, 09:27 AM
  3. Windows 7 backup Issue
    By Maragato in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-19-2011, 08:54 PM
  4. Good Linux workstation backup solution
    By EVOEx in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-07-2010, 06:36 PM
  5. We don't need to backup...
    By Salem in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-19-2007, 01:12 PM