Here is a video link You can watch Pranav Mistry: The thrilling potential of SixthSense technology | Video on TED.com
Here is a video link You can watch Pranav Mistry: The thrilling potential of SixthSense technology | Video on TED.com
Yes. I'm moving this to Tech Board because I anticipate discussion of the technology rather than anything to do with C programming per se.
Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart WayOriginally Posted by Bjarne Stroustrup (2000-10-14)
I enjoy TED and might check this out sometime, but I think this should fall in the "General Discussions" category.
EDIT: Too late
I tend to agree in that this isn't anything that new or revolutionary. Sure the topic seems cool off hand if you aren't paying attention however, Microsoft's Kinect essentially is the same thing. The only difference is you don't strap a Xbox360 to your back and walk around with it; which as CommonTater pointed out - why would you want to?
And I am sure Microsoft is planning on exposing the interface through the XNA framework so if you are willing to play with C#, and pay the membership fee) you could design apps like this as well. Probably something even cooler due to the processing power of the 360.
They are doing even better than that. They are preparing a Windows Kinect SDK.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
I hope there's an awesome twist at the end of this video.
Sent from my iPadŽ
I was hoping more something like: "Really, we are joking folks! This is pretty stupid if you come to think of it. What we did here is another motion sensing device. Forget all that nonsense about objects and real life. That's my open source marketing department talk."
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
"Open source marketing" is something of an oxymoron, don't you think?
But yes, it is considerably less impressive than he makes it seem... basically it it is a vision sensor tied to a projector... interresting, but hardly something anyone needs in day to day computing... I, for one, am not about to walk around with a bunch of crap strapped to my body just so I can do a task that is easily done on a smartphone I can stick in my pocket.
Not all of us want to be inserparably tied to --hence: dependent upon-- computers.
Last edited by CommonTater; 08-03-2011 at 07:47 AM.
Yes. A real one.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
I have implemented a truly marvelous program for this, which this margin is too narrow to contain.Originally Posted by Vxyz
What exactly do you mean by "how"? If you have any visions of grandeur of implementing such a system yourself, take AndrewHunter's advice about learning how to program first.
Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart WayOriginally Posted by Bjarne Stroustrup (2000-10-14)