One thing I've been wondering for a while now is why my CPU workloads seem to mirror each other?
I'm running Ubuntu Linux with a dual-core and in the System Monitor the CPU graph shows the CPU's in almost mirror images of each other (when one gets busier, the other gets less busy) and they keep swapping which CPU is on top and which is on bottom...
Is there a particular reason why they do that?
"I am probably the laziest programmer on the planet, a fact with which anyone who has ever seen my code will agree." - esbo, 11/15/2008
"the internet is a scary place to be thats why i dont use it much." - billet, 03/17/2010
Yes, work-saving thread-swapping when a single-threaded CPU-intensive app is running will swap from one CPU to another. Windows used to be bad at this, but is a bit better now - but all OS's will do this to some extent - if you have one process that really runs 100%, it will swap whenever there are two other processes that must run - which happens every so often (how often depends on what else is going on in the system, such as if there is file or network activity that needs to be dealt with, if there are server/service processes running in the background, etc, etc).
Since the OS often doesn't know how long a newly awakened process will run, it's best to schedule any process that needs to run on the first available processor. If there are processes that are runnable that haven't run for a while, and there are processes that have been running for a long time, the OS will prioritize those tasks that haven't run for a bit, so that they do not get starved of CPU. And sometimes this means that the next process(es) to run is not the 100% CPU eating process, but some other process.
--
Mats
Compilers can produce warnings - make the compiler programmers happy: Use them!
Please don't PM me for help - and no, I don't do help over instant messengers.
I can see why a process that gets task swapped out of the CPU might not get the same CPU when it's turn comes again, but what I can't figure out is why the CPU's seem to be exact opposites of each other? If CPU1 goes up 3%, CPU2 goes down 3%, if CPU1 goes down 5%, CPU2 goes up 5%...
"I am probably the laziest programmer on the planet, a fact with which anyone who has ever seen my code will agree." - esbo, 11/15/2008
"the internet is a scary place to be thats why i dont use it much." - billet, 03/17/2010
That would make sense, if the system as a whole has a fairly constant amount of load. It's just shifting load from one CPU to another.Originally Posted by cpjust
Code://try //{ if (a) do { f( b); } while(1); else do { f(!b); } while(1); //}
Try a
Then the loads on the 2 CPU should add up to 100% all the time (max 200%).Code:int main() { for(;;); }
