It would be good for you to provide an example of such a container class and its associated documentation for readers here to examine since it is possible that you may have misinterpreted the claim,...
Type: Posts; User: laserlight
It would be good for you to provide an example of such a container class and its associated documentation for readers here to examine since it is possible that you may have misinterpreted the claim,...
You might want to elaborate on this. For example, by "set" you presumably mean a set of values on a line. Do you want to sort the values within each set? Do you want to sort the sets themselves with...
You need to construct the filename from the command line argument, e.g., by creating an array of char large enough to hold the result, then copying the command line argument followed by ".txt".
It sounds like this is the problem text rather than a paraphrase: "The numbers must be separated from other words by at least one whitespace."
If so, "word" in this context is used to mean...
Yes, and of the same type.
This:
(&x)[i]
is equivalent to:
*(&x + i)
Suppose i == 0, then we end up with:
*(&x + 0)
which is equivalent to:
Instead of parsing the number yourself, I wonder if it will be easier to "cheat" by replacing the comma, if one exists, with a period, then calling something like strtod.
Declare the array in the caller and pass a pointer to the array as an argument when calling the function. It is also wise to have a parameter for the size of the array.
Alternatively, you can use...
Post in a new thread since it is unrelated.
What is the version of g++ that you're using? I believe g++ has defaulted to C++11 or later for a few major versions now, e.g., a quick check shows g++ 6.5 will default to the GNU dialect of C++14.
Oh, but that wouldn't help you understand the code flow, if by that you mean the flow of control through the program. That would be done by tracing function call graphs rather than by finding all...
Wait, so you're not compiling with respect to C++11 or later?
Why do you want to find all calls of that method? Usually I'd imagine it is to perform a rename, and your IDE may have a specific refactoring tool for that, but then indirect invocation of the method...
That's what I had in mind when I wrote that "just that certain implementations may permit it for their own use cases".
No, just assigning an arbitrary address without doing pointer arithmetic is...
The rule that you might be thinking of is the one about pointer arithmetic with respect to the elements of an array: in such a case the standard defines addition of an integer to a pointer such that...
On the contrary, you do have to declare variables before assigning to them (or from them, for that matter).
Anyway, the reason why john.c is facepalming so hard is that the tutorial that Salem was...
oods1, do you have a computer programming background, and are you familiar with the C programming language?
If you're willing to use the non-standard but POSIX-standard getline function, then life is somewhat easier:
char *line = NULL;
size_t len = 0;
if (getline(&line, &len, stdin) != -1)
{
//...
No, let's take a look at this line:
*(ptr_arr+i) = word;
it would be slightly easier if we transformed it to use array notation:
ptr_arr[i] = word;
ptr_arr[i] is an int, whereas word is a...
I would start by defining a function to print a single employee's data:
void print_employee(FILE *fp, const Employee *employee);
I would manually create an Employee object and test this...
Your compiler is right: to compute the height, you don't need to modify the struct object, therefore this:
int vertexheight(struct parabola * p, double *y);
should have been:
int...
The easiest may well be to just compare the characters:
if (a[4] == 'J' && a[13] == 'R')
If you really want to form a string out of them:
char sample[3] = "";
sample[0] = a[4];
sample[1] =...
Write the loop and place it in a function that returns a value that you can then check in a conditional. Problem solved.
Just work with 16 characters at a time. It wouldn't be a null terminated string, but you probably don't need that for encryption.
That implies that the array of pointers is an array of char pointers (i.e., char*[N]), which means that the parameter should be a pointer to a pointer to char (i.e., char**).
By using pointers....