Search:

correct, I don't want to learn programming at this time. I know what I know and any further learning will have to wait, until I have time. I had a deadline, and what I needed was answers, not some...

127 - n, right you are thanks.

Apology? Had you have answered the question to begin with, with a simple // 127 -n // there would have only been one reply. But instead you chose to play the role of...

hmm that's disappointing. I am not here for jokes and if I wanted to work something out myself, I would not consult a forum. In someway it might seem fair enough to act like a teacher and provide...

a lookup table. I was thinking something like two's complement or similar, maybe one's complement, but couldn't get it to work, but it seems like it should. what do you think?

Thanks. However, the time taken for a for loop is too long. It must be done on the fly, each time the value appears.

I have a range of numbers from 0 - 127, and I want them to come out in the reverse order.

So, when 0 is read it is displayed as 127, 1 is displayed as 126 .....
and 127 is displayed as 0.

How...

what have I done here. This was an earlier attempt, it worked but it was like some sort of filter that let the value slowly wind its way up to the highest step.
I actually like that delay for...

WOW, that's impressive, to me anyway. So simple. I have been banging my head on the desk all day, and had just finished writing out 64 if else statements to do the job, which works, but is so poor in...

thanks. Cannot afford the delay of a for loop, it is an interrupt routine. On a single pass through the function, it must be determined that the value has increased or decreased by the step size, and...

there is a variable that can change from 0 - 100. And I would like the step size to be variable.
e.g. 0, 1, 2, 3.....
2, 4, 6 ....
10, 20, 30, ...... etc

aside from a huge if else statement...