If you read the entire post, which isn't that long, that is obviously not the problem, the case is way too simpllistic for that to be an issue. I have one test case that works, and one, that doesn't....
Type: Posts; User: phylene
If you read the entire post, which isn't that long, that is obviously not the problem, the case is way too simpllistic for that to be an issue. I have one test case that works, and one, that doesn't....
BS. I made two reasonable responsesafter which the dick had to show itself. Don't need it.
And quite proud of it, thank you.
Yes, I am a sexist, so what? Comes from years in IT having to deal with sexism. YEARS of it. But throw that aside for a second. My two previous posts were reasoned and DID include infomation...
Everything is done with the gnu tool chain, same version, same os (linux mint lisa.) Thank you for a reasoned and even reply.
Sure, I have issues with ..............s. That 99% of them are men? Hey, that's not my doing.
I had to change the correct symbol names for contractual reasons. YOU KNOW that the symbol names aren't the issue, you just decided beating your shest and grunting was the easier response.
What's...
yeah, I know, that was a typo. If that were the actual problem the linker would say it can;t find the library, not that it couldn't find a symbol in the library no?
I wonder if this is the solution to my problem; http://cboard.cprogramming.com/cplusplus-programming/146990-linking-cplusplus-static-libs.html, but I'm confused as to why the linker won't like a c++...
boost & gpb (and many others, its hardly a new problem and there are lots of solutions out there) are great but if you want to learn, roll your own custom solution for your app, its the best way to...
Hey, does tbb have anything over on pthreads? Is it like, better, easier to use, anything like that?
Could use some direction here; I have a static lib I've created using the correct tools; I know this as I have a working example test case. The only difference is the simple lib's syms are exported...