reference is work like constant pointer ,so all advantages of return by pointer works.
Type: Posts; User: hr1212s
reference is work like constant pointer ,so all advantages of return by pointer works.
dude read this
Tower of Hanoi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1st
for(count=1;count<=5;++count) ; is same as for(count=1;count<=5;++count){}
no semicolon required
2nd
find its explanation on Google.
if you look at the memory allocation of process,
there are 2 areas 1)permanent storage area where program code and global variables are stored 2)this area is shared by stack and dynamic memory...
apple's product are always innovative.
microsoft's product looks like modification to their old version with fancy gui.
it is just my opinion.
you are printing "unsigned long"
for double use "double"
well if you consider "1" in 8 bit system it looks like 0 0000001
first 0 indicates it is positive number 7 bits are for magnitude
for "-1"...
might be you are talking about memory allocation in heap.
in many application you can't know how much memory is required in your program, for example library application.
in this you cant know...
it is example of diamond problem.
are you saying that diamond problem is a virtual path inheritance or it is any inheritance in which class is inherited with virtual keyword?
this is just new achievement . we are now able to modify our DNA structure to embed better qualities to human. research are done on some animals successfully.
so there is no any destruction of man...
i have seen this word in interview question .
i don't know if this kind of thing is existing or not. may be it is same as multiple path inheritance(diamond problem)!
indent properly
is dhis e qestion?
hey ,will you please give some idea about what -Wall and -pedantic does in code::blocks !
i haven't find it on google.
oh thanks guys,
during this i found link Anonymous Union
which point to same conclusion that, this code is fine and error is bug of compiler
yes it gives me error
it is simplified code,
i'm using code::blocks 8.02 . is it non standard thing or it's my compiler's fault?
if we construct anonymous static union ,at file scope my compiler(gcc) gives error:segmentation fault
why this is so!
static union{int a;};
int main()
{
return 0;
}
yes reference will definitely work ,
but I don’t understand code tag ,EVOEx,will u please elaborate this.
this code in c++
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{ return 0; }
struct X;
struct Y;
struct Y
{ X ox; };
struct X