Search:

thank you!
that was it. everything is working now. i didn't expect any error state in such a simple case.

hi Guys,

i'm puzzled by the values i'm getting back from stringstream


#include <sstream>
#include <iostream>

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{

hi and Welcome EyesOnly,

on windows, winsock has a similar API.
by connection i assume you mean you want to use TCP.

one of the differences is, on windows you have to call:
- WSAStartup()...

thanks for all the suggestions. i thought i'd close the topic properly because i already resolved this a while ago.

the problem was that i didn't understand the tcp shutdown sequence. i was...

thanks for the advice.
i have added exceptions.
i think i'll do what dra and matsp said ( destroy and create a new object ). keeps things simple and reflects the winsock documentation.
...

yeah. i guess it's not the best example. i was planning on adding error checking afterwards.
actually i don't want to make a copy because that would mean an other object with the same value is left...

oh i'm not familiar implementing ref counting. this is the code i was talking about

mySocket.h


#if !defined(_MYSOCKET_H)
#define _MYSOCKET_H

#include <string>
#include <winsock2.h>

when i overload the assignment operator the destructor of the temporary object still gets called.

if i change the data member of the assigning ( right hand ) object to a specific invalid value...

thanks,

well basicly this object is in this case a data member of a class (by value).
i prefer keeping things by value and i can see how you are right.

i don't really want to drift off topic...

hi Guys,

i got a question...
lets say i have a class "A" that can only be constructed with an int parameter

like this:


A objA(1);

hmm the tcp socket layer is telling me that my data got through when it didn't.
the recieving application had already closed the connection and even exitted (properly).

- how is everything...

hi brewbuck,

as you mentioned, a third attemp by the client gave an error ( 10053 - WSAECONNABORTED )

how am i supposed to know have figured out that the second attemp failed? ( adding...

hi trinli,

a call to WSAGetLastError() which retrieves the winsock error returns 0
( this should mean, no error if i remember )

i guess i could have expected that since send did not return -1...

i have been fidgeting with winsock tcp ( i created simple client and server applications with only a main function )

(i know this isn't the code but i'm trying to get the idea across i can post...

in tcp with accept



SOCKET accept( SOCKET s, struct sockaddr FAR* addr, int FAR* addrlen );


when i call:

i have been fidgeting winsock's udp.

the function recvfrom mainly:



int recvfrom( SOCKET s, char FAR* buf, int len, int flags, struct sockaddr FAR* from, int FAR* fromlen );


it has been...

thanks for the replies.
i almost forgot i asked this question.
i wanted a class that must to be initialized.
thanks edoceo. that's exactly what i was looking for.

Greetings

hi Guys,

i basicly want a class that has no default constructor as a data member of another class. something like this:



class A
{
public:
A( int x );

interesting.
thanks again laserlight (problem solved)

Greetings

thank you for your insight everyone!
i think i don't think i'll be passing primitive types by reference for reasons.

Greetings

hi Guys,

well i have a small issue (i think). i have a class that only contains one variable and i was wondering if i could assign an object of this class, to a variable of the same type as it's...

thanks for the response Phyxashun,
i see.

what i'm wondering now is, whether there is a cost in passing an int by reference.
- and if it exist, wheter it would be more or less than the copy of...

hi guys

i was wondering if i should rigorously stick to passing by reference.

i was wondering if someone knew what kind of effect passing a const int by reference would have? ( what about...

i've been experimenting with the winsock libray. and i'm still new to it so bear with me.

just an observation...
isn't a call to listen always followed by a call accept?
there must be a reason...

thanks baccardi