No, I disagree. The standard is the lowest common denominator, and there are several system where this feature is in fact overridden.
Plus, working on legacy systems, the compiler it may even...
Type: Posts; User: glennik
No, I disagree. The standard is the lowest common denominator, and there are several system where this feature is in fact overridden.
Plus, working on legacy systems, the compiler it may even...
Yes, according to the 6.7.8 (10) of the C99 standard. But, as always, there might be compiler specific options which overrides this. Therefor you cannot assume things like this and always initialize...
Look at the %d scanf format and the type of the variable contch.
These casts are not unnecessary, but rather highly clarifying, indicating that that this is a willed and controlled cast. In a such low rigid language like C, where you basically are allowed to do...
When the objects a linked, a global symbol table is created in the executable. In this symbol table, the exported symbols have capital letters, while non exported symbols have small letters. Look at...
If a type of that name is already defined, you should get a compiler warning / error (use the pedantic flag). If the header where its defined is not used in your project, it should not be a problem,...
You have not provided a type, just a definition, the correct declaration is:
struct
{
tbaAmtType bigLimitAmt;
longDescType longDesc;
tba800ErrorMsgType ...
Then, I believe he is referring to statically linking of the resources that you are using in your code, and not runtime libraries. I assume that you have some limitations regarding OS etc. (eg. you...
Usually, when referring to external dependencies, you refer to dll or other resources that YOUR code is actually using, and not the linking of runtime libraries, which always is required in a runtime...
Compared to what you are referring to, using a class scope variable with public access, would i C be using an extern decalaration, which is pretty much the opposite of what I stated.
However, I...
No, its not, you are allocating totalFiles, which is the input, times 10 which is the size of one element the array times the size of the element type.
However, you are right about the pointer to...
itCbitC: I does not matter if changes the paramters, the calloc statement is still wrong. The sizeof(char**) will yield 4, which is the size of the pointer and not the sizeof an element in the multi...
Oh..., you are doing all sorts or errors. First of all, you need to learn the difference between arrays and pointers, second you need to understand the difference between multidimmensional arrays and...
Short answer, you can't.
to do what you want, you can
memcpy((void*)root->num, (void*)newNum, sizeof(newNum));
which implies that newNum is an array and not a pointer. If newNum is a pointer...
Global variables requires a carefull mind of the programmer, but its not necessarily bad design. The same applies to goto, which is highly useful in error correction in the lack of better methods,...
From my point of view, which can be cluttered by the fact that the the type node is not presented, is that you are handling the pointers wrong, which will result it random i values. The obvoius...
I've not compiled or run your code, but the most obvious error is that you do not initialize the buffer to zero, and using character based printout device you can suffer from any kind unpredicatble...
You can use a union, its just these kind of purposes its ment for:
typedef union
{
unsigned char b[2];
unsigned short c;
} byteArr_t;
You can use functions pointers to store references to functions, which will work across code spaces (files, libraries etc). The fuctions pointers can be stored in variables, structures, tables etc....