The only thing, which I don't understand. Why it's done like that? I won't say that it's too handy...
On one hand, if you want function to be overriden, you may define pure virtual and other...
Type: Posts; User: vronin
The only thing, which I don't understand. Why it's done like that? I won't say that it's too handy...
On one hand, if you want function to be overriden, you may define pure virtual and other...
Got it. It look that I even found this in C++ specification.
http://www.kuzbass.ru:8086/docs/isocpp/derived.html#class.abstract
-8- A virtual function declared in a class shall be defined, or...
Here some stuff which I did in Visual Studio 2005 and CodeWarrior.
So, it's definitelly not a jsut compiler bug.
I defined class like this:
class A
{
public: