So, does this mean the the MS compiler interprets the ANSI C++ standard such that nobody can overload both the (operator []) and (operator char *) functions in the same class?!!
That is ludicrous.
Type: Posts; User: Aaron^
So, does this mean the the MS compiler interprets the ANSI C++ standard such that nobody can overload both the (operator []) and (operator char *) functions in the same class?!!
That is ludicrous.
Right now (for testing purposes), I have two functions in my class besides the default constructor:
#1: char operator [](unsigned long iIndex) const;
#2: operator const char *() const;
Later on,...