Search:

Brewbuck, you're a genius! That sounds like a great idea. It may even run faster if I parallelise it :-)

Thanks!

I suspected so, looking at the backtrace (posted above). That's unfortunate for us.


The thing is, the datum really is OK but the lib code is not. The lib code will work with most data but in...

Yes, that's what I meant, from an OS point of view it does make sense. From a programmer's point of view retrying that instruction would mean that the source of the problem must be fixed first. ...

assert() does. But then assert could also be easily replaced my myassert() which in my code would unfortunately only solve a small part of the problem.



Oh, it goes to the same instruction? ...

Dear Brewbuck,



Thanks, I also googled about that and had still some hope left that I could make it work. I suspect that the exception handling tries something that fails because it relies on...

Dear cpjust,
Dear Mats,

Thanks for your input. Maybe it is possible to do something along those lines. I am unsure whether it is possible to shadow abort since I am not calling it directly. ...

Dear Mats,



Exactly that, as I just wrote in my reply above. The problems only occur with specific data -- which, however, cannot easily be tested for this feature except by using it. This,...

Dear Salem,



That's a good point, thanks for your feedback. However, in this case it really would make sense to continue: To sum it up, I am generating random data structures in a loop, then...

Dear CornedBee,

Thanks for your reply!



How can a signal handler that was called by abort() return? If it does, where would it go? Please elaborate a little bit on the reason so that I can...

Hello,

I am running a very computationally expensive program that is parallelised and still runs for many days. It is therefore undesirable for it to stop if a runtime error occurs; precious CPU...