"problem" so far are the stl containers, they love to copy. do java/c#/python containers just hold references to avoid that?
Type: Posts; User: pheres
"problem" so far are the stl containers, they love to copy. do java/c#/python containers just hold references to avoid that?
I don't want (or even can) contradict you. Therefore I had to learn the MS techniques first. I really wanted to find out if they can beat the C++ environment as often claimed. I'm not convinced so...
So one needs (sometimes, sometimes not) a kind of function to describe copy semantics exactly as in C++. No score for java/c# (regarding "easier" programming) again?
What hinders you from...
How can you do deep copys in that languages?
i think I see there our differences in usage experiences come from, so your extended elaborations was not useless :)
it seems you expect some form of round trip engineering capability from your gui...
Could you elaborate a bit more what you mean?
For example I run the gui designer, place all windows, dialogs and controls I need and save. Then I run the code editor and connect my backend...
And in java for example you have not to care about semantics? how is that possible?
what do you have to think about memory management if you just push your objects into an stl::vector for example any more than say in java?
It depends on the frameworks much more than on the language. Most frameworks have bindings for several languages. What makes it in C# easier to say: "draw a window and put some controls in it" than...
Why not just update all modules in an atomic manner, after compiler/ SP/ settings changed?
Of course, this is not doable in all circumstances. So I think the rule to avoid complex types in...
The link says:
Fortunately I control the compiler for all modules. But it was an interesting read, so thanks.
C++ has no support for it at all. You mean operating systems specific compiler/loader/linker.
Why that? Thats a function of mine I call from a lot of different DLLs for example
const...