Search:

Type: Posts; User: hckr83

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Replies
    6
    Views
    2,014

    yes i was thinking the +9 would mean +9 bytes...

    yes
    i was thinking the +9 would mean +9 bytes not patch_entry structs
  2. Replies
    6
    Views
    2,014

    thank you so much for pointing that out for me...

    thank you so much for pointing that out for me
    it is actually of type patch_entry which is a struct(8byte)
  3. Replies
    6
    Views
    2,014

    Does this even remotely make sense

    I have encountered a very very strange situation in this


    //patches is a **ptr
    tmp_ptr=patches[0]+9; //when i printf'ed this it said 0x3F0072

    tmp_ptr=patches[0]; //when i printf'ed this it...
  4. hmmm didnt know that so how could I put eof in...

    hmmm didnt know that
    so how could I put eof in those functions
  5. Anything wrong with this(char to short and int)

    I have made some handy things since i have to read words and dwords often but i think something is wrong with them
    could someone tell me what is wrong with them


    //these do NO checking so to...
  6. Replies
    10
    Views
    4,521

    I thought that const was the compilers default...

    I thought that const was the compilers default type and volatile was the opposite of const though
    am i incorrect
Results 1 to 6 of 8