Search:

Assembly is a robot. It does what you tell it to do.

First debugging... then testing... then testing again... then releasing beta version. Just a hint. ;) I know what you're going to say (that it still may have some mistakes AND/OR that some time of...

I just typed www.dprogramming.com into my address bar and guess what I got - the D programming language!


Those extra features doesn't make the program "stronger", I think performance is close to...

I know what you're talking about. And as a reverse engineer I have quite a good idea how the memory layout works. Though I didn't assume you were talking about local variables, because it is not a...

Trying to write to the code section should trigger a general protection fault. Trying to write to an unallocated memory will certainly fail too. And data is usually in the data section, which is...

Debuggers need to do the same job once what a run-time environment does every time you run the application.

I just haven't seen any actually useful features in new languages. Of course it's possible to create really useful features, but I haven't heard of such yet. But there are too many new languages...

Namespaces - what do they solve? I don't think you'll have so many functions that you run out of letter combinations for a function.
Garbage collection - Yikes... never heard of freeing memory? When...

We have everything we need - Assembly for performance, C for saving time, C++ for complexity.

I would never wish there would be another programming language made. As far as I know, all new languages are slow, ugly and obfuscated.