if you can make foo a member function with one param instead of a non-member function with two params, you can take advantage of polymorphism to get the right type of object instantiated. Please...
Type: Posts; User: redfiche
if you can make foo a member function with one param instead of a non-member function with two params, you can take advantage of polymorphism to get the right type of object instantiated. Please...
Setting the strings = "NULL" would be changing the data.
Empty strings are not null. It's not the database, it is ODBC, which does if (field.IsEmpty()) field.m_null = true. The problem seems to...
Hi all
I have a CRecordset derived class, with some string fields which correspond to non-nullable columns in the database. Unfortunately, it seems that ODBC converts empty strings to null, so my...
My $0.02: If you already know how to program in one or more other languages, you have a chance at learning C++ in 21, especially if one of those other languages is OO. The syntax of the language is...
7stud:
I knew my audience would know I spoke of a member function.
Codeplug confirmed my suspicion. Thanks.
Hi all
I'm a little confused about the difference between:
bool const Foo();
and
bool Foo() const;