View Poll Results: How do you grade that book?

Voters
2. You may not vote on this poll
  • Good Book

    0 0%
  • Good but with some shortcomings

    0 0%
  • Bad Book

    2 100.00%

Thread: Bruce Eckel

  1. #1
    System Novice siavoshkc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tehran
    Posts
    1,246

    Bruce Eckel

    Whats your idea about his Thinking in C++ book?
    Learn C++ (C++ Books, C Books, FAQ, Forum Search)
    Code painter latest version on sourceforge DOWNLOAD NOW!
    Download FSB Data Integrity Tester.
    Siavosh K C

  2. #2
    spurious conceit MK27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    segmentation fault
    Posts
    8,300
    I haven't read it so I won't vote, but I had some thoughts on Eckel's politics ("Bruce seems to have a salesman's prerogative and it infects his writing in a very negative way") as expressed in some quotations from the book here:

    Questions regarding the text in Thinking in C++ by Bruce Eckel

    And IMO if your thinking is that sloppy off-topic it's probably less than ideal when on topic. Ie, I'll probably never bother to look at the book, there are plenty of better things to read (it's either bad or good with some shortcomings).
    Last edited by MK27; 06-15-2010 at 10:32 AM.
    C programming resources:
    GNU C Function and Macro Index -- glibc reference manual
    The C Book -- nice online learner guide
    Current ISO draft standard
    CCAN -- new CPAN like open source library repository
    3 (different) GNU debugger tutorials: #1 -- #2 -- #3
    cpwiki -- our wiki on sourceforge

  3. #3
    Master Apprentice phantomotap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    I see it recommended a lot, but the books are garbage.

    The broken source, flawed theory, poor design, and the authors own misunderstanding of C++ make the books useless.

    Soma

  4. #4
    chococoder
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    515
    haven't read it in depth, but his much-advocated Thinking in Java is utter rubbish.
    Worst practices promoted as best practices, basic logical flaws, many fundamental OO concepts glossed over or (worse) false presented, etc. etc.

    Shows clearly Eckel either doesn't know or care about proper programming practice, writing his books like some "teach yourself programmin in 24 hours using Java" (or C++) fashion.

    His writing on other websites are of a similar calibre, albeit dressed in a lot of hype and expensive words and acronyms to make them appear authoritive (which invariably causes a lot of people who should know better to pipe in with statements of how brilliant he is).

  5. #5
    Master Apprentice phantomotap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    his much-advocated Thinking in Java is utter rubbish.
    Worst practices promoted as best practices, basic logical flaws, many fundamental OO concepts glossed over or (worse) false presented, etc. etc.
    So his Java books are as bad as his C++ books!? Noted.

    Soma

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Questions regarding the text in Thinking in C++ by Bruce Eckel
    By capt.jack in forum General Discussions
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-06-2010, 12:15 PM
  2. Bruce Eckel
    By nevermind in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-20-2002, 04:39 PM