Operator overloading for an inner class of a class template causes compilation error

Hi,

could you please answer why the following code causes a compilation error?
How could one avoid the error while keeping the definition of the struct B within the struct A?

Code:

---

#include <iostream>

template<typename T> struct A {
  struct B { T t; };
  B b;
};

template<typename T>
std::ostream& operator << (std::ostream& os, const typename A<T>::B& b) {
    return os<<"an instance of B";
}

int main() {
    A<int> a;
    std::cout<<a.b<<std::endl;
    return 0;
}

---

It seems to me that for some reason the compiler can't deduce the type needed. I unsuccessfully tried to compile the code using MS VC++ 2005 compiler and Borland C++ Compiler 5.5.

MS VC++ 2005 compiler says:
binary '<<' : no operator found which takes a right-hand operand of type 'A<T>::B' (or there is no acceptable conversion) with [T=int]

Borland C++ Compiler 5.5 says:
'operator<<' not implemented in type 'std::ostream' for arguments of type 'A<int>::B' in function main()

Thanks!
Alex

Maybe

Code:

---

template<typename T>
std::ostream& A<T>::B::operator << (std::ostream& os, const typename A<T>::B& b) {
    return os<<"an instance of B";
}

---

?

Thank you for your answer.
However it can't help me since the operator must not be a member of the struct B
(the operator takes ostream as the left operand).

Alex

That's an interresting problem. I couldn't get GCC to understand what you're trying to do without making it a friend function....

Code:

---

template<typename T>
struct A
{
    struct B
    {
        T t;
    };
   
    B b;

    friend std::ostream& operator << (std::ostream& os, const B &b)
    {
        return os << "an instance of B";
    }
};

---

gg

I'm not exactly sure why the compiler is unable to infer the proper type here. There is a workaround. Instead of specifying "typename A<T>::B&" as the type, just use "T&".

But you say, "This will cause the operator to be invoked for EVERY type T, not just those of form A<X>::B." Correct. So we need to use some template instantiation rules to prevent that from happening. In this case, SFINAE, "Specialization failure is not an error."

You can do this by adding a special member to the B structure which indicates that it is, in fact, of type A<X>::B. Let's make a bogus class called I_Am_A_B:

Code:

---

struct I_Am_A_B { };

---

Then place an instance of this class inside the B struct:

Code:

---

template <typename T>
struct A
{
    struct B { T t; I_Am_A_B i_am_a_b; }
    B b;
};

template <typename T>
std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, const T& b)
{
    return os<<"an instance of B";
    // PREVENT INSTANTIATION OF THIS TEMPLATE IF T IS NOT A A<X>::B TYPE.
    b.i_am_a_b;
}

---

Does that look awful? That's because it is. But it's the only way I could make it work (aside from the friend method someone else found).

Dear Codeplug and brewbuck,

thank you for your answers!
I believe both pieces of code you provided (and even my code) must be compilable with a "right" compiler. Unfortunately, this is not the case for MS VC++ 2005 compiler and Borland C++ Compiler 5.5. According to Codeplug's message, GCC is more "right".

brewbuck, do you know a compiler that compiles the code you provided?

Thanks!
Alex

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cale

Dear Codeplug and brewbuck,

thank you for your answers!
I believe both pieces of code you provided (and even my code) must be compilable with a "right" compiler. Unfortunately, this is not the case for MS VC++ 2005 compiler and Borland C++ Compiler 5.5. According to Codeplug's message, GCC is more "right".

---

My gcc didn't compile your code, either.

Quote:

---

brewbuck, do you know a compiler that compiles the code you provided?

---

I tested it on gcc. Seems to work here. Good luck. I wish I knew why the original doesn't work.

The compiler cannot infer the template parameter T for your case. There was a thread here not long ago ...
http://cboard.cprogramming.com/showt...ate+specialize

I believe Codeplug's version, if it works, would be best. brewbuck's version works, too, but comes with size overhead in B. That can be changed by making B::ImaB a type, not a member, and using MPL's HAS_XXX and Boost.EnableIf.