"overflow in implicit constant conversion"

Hello. Absolute beginner.

I'm following the code in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVo0NVGUsU0
I worked out the code exactly as is by the end of the video. My result is different. Of all the videos I followed, this is the only time my code is producing a different result than his.

The full code is

Code:

---

#include <iostream>
#include <limits.h>

using namespace std;

int main() {

    int value = -54656;
    cout << value << endl;

    cout << "Max int value: "<< INT_MAX << endl;
    cout << "Max int value: "<< INT_MIN << endl;

    long int lValue = 2345325345345;
    cout << lValue << endl;

    short int sValue = 23434;
    cout << sValue << endl;

    cout << "Size of int: " << sizeof(int) << endl;
    cout << "Size of short int: " << sizeof(short int) << endl;

    unsigned int uValue = 2342343;
    cout << uValue << endl;

    return 0;
}

---

My result in the console is

Code:

---

-54656
Max int value: 2147483647
Max int value: -2147483648
273201729
23434
Size of int: 4
Size of short int: 2
2342343

---

His result is

Code:

---

Max int value: 2147483647
Max int value: -2147483648
2345325345345
23434
Size of int: 4
Size of short int: 2
2342343

---

I also have "overflow in implicit constant conversion" here:

Code:

---

    long int lValue = 2345325345345;

---

Why is my result different than his?

I'm using Eclipse Luna Service Release 2 (4.4.2), MingGW GC 78

What hardware are you running on? Add this line to your program:

Code:

---

cout << "Size of long int" << sizeof(long int) << endl;

---

If it prints 4, then you have your answer – it's likely 8 byte on his machine.

Edit: Actually, this might be OS dependent (I wasn't aware), check this out.

I get 4.
Yeah, he's on a Mac, I'm on a PC.

Alright. I was more concerned that this could be a serious problem down the road. Thanks!122

There are actually types that have a specific width. Those are way better to use than int, long, short, etc IMO.