templating the container and contained type

Code:

---

template<typename T>class foo
{
  T *t;
};

template<template<typename conatinedType>class container,typename containedType>void func(container<containedType>& c)
{
  c.size();
}
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
  std::vector< foo<int> >v;
  func(v);
        return 0;
}

---

Quote:

---

Error 1 error C2039: 'size' : is not a member of 'std::_Container_base_aux_alloc_empty<_Alloc>' c:\users\mfowler\documents\visual studio 2008\projects\test\test\test.cpp 13

---

what i'd like to do is make a function that can process different kinds of stl containers, provided that they provide the required API. e.g. i may need to use a vector at some point and a valarray later. this is the attempted implementation that seems to come closest to doing what i want, but it's obviously still failing.

any ideas? thanks.

It's probably simpler like this:

Code:

---

template <class Container>
void foo(const Container& c)
{
    //contained type is:
    typename Container::value_type item;
}

---

STL containers provide a bunch of typedefs for similar purposes.

Why are you providing 2 containedType parameters?
template<template<typename conatinedType>class container,typename containedType>void func(container<containedType>& c)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elysia

Why are you providing 2 containedType parameters?
template<template<typename conatinedType>class container,typename containedType>void func(container<containedType>& c)

---

because otherwise it gave me a syntax error :\

like i said, i tried a bunch of different template declarations and this one seemed to be the closest to working.

Your template pattern cannot match std::vector, since std::vector takes more than one template parameter. The others have defaults, but they do exist.

Basically, your implementation limits you to container types which take precisely one template parameter. That's like, basically none of them.

aaaah good catch.

i'm only concerned with a small subset of stl for now, so i think that will give me what i need. thx bb.

my function signature actually looks like:

Code:

---

void function(vector< foo<int> >&v,foo<int>& f)
{
//...
}

---

i wanted to make it explicitly clear that the contained type of the vector should be the same as the other function arguments, but i suppose

Code:

---

template<class container,typename T>void function(container& v,foo<T>& f)
{
//...
}

---

is sufficiently explicit, plus it has the additional benefit of actually working.

The big problem with template template parameters is that the argument you pass has to have exactly that many template parameters - defaults are not considered. (I believe this will be remedied by C++0x's template aliases, but I'm not entirely sure.)
Now add to that the fact that the standard library may give all their templates any number of template parameters, as long as all those beyond the standard-specified set are defaulted. For example, instead of making their safe STL depend on a preprocessor macro that's giving ABI-concerned people nightmares without end, Microsoft could have implemented it like this:

Code:

---

template <typename _Ty, typename _Alloc = std::allocator<_Ty>, bool _Safe = _CRT_DEFAULT_SAFE_MODE>
class vector ...

---

This would have been perfectly conforming, but would break any program that expected std::vector to match a template template parameter with two parameters.
Which is why there are no such programs, and template template parameters are in extreme disuse.

Edit:

Quote:

---

i wanted to make it explicitly clear that the contained type of the vector should be the same as the other function arguments

---

No problem:

Code:

---

template<class container, typename T>
void function(container& v, typename container::value_type& f)
{
//...
}

---

And for heaven's sake, give your code a little space to breathe.