Thread: zombie analysis

Hey,

first i will post my code, then i say what happens when i start the program.

Code:

int fork_service(service_t *s){
        int pid;
        pid = fork();
        if (pid == -1){
                perror("ERRfork_service: ");
                return -1;
        }
        if (pid == 0){
                // child
                int ret;
                if ((ret = execvp(s->path, s->flags)) == -1){
                        perror("ERRfork_service: "); //should never get here
                        //need to free allocations?
                        exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
                }
        }
        //parent;
        return pid;
}

ok i run this and look at the process table:

#ps -ax
...
9228 pts/5 S+ 0:00 ./a.out
9232 pts/5 Z+ 0:00 [thttpd] <defunct>
9233 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/thttpd -C /etc/thttpd/thttpd.conf
...

and

#ps -ejH says that the zombie is a child of a.out, and the running thttpd process is a direct child of init.

say if i am right with this:

when thttpd starts it immediately forks a copy of its own, then the "original" thttpd exits, (...and becomes a zombie), and "init" inherits the thttpd child.

now i am out of control of killing the process that i started at some time in the program, which originally was my plan...

is the thttpd behavior like an often used strategy or so?

thanks for any comments,

felix

thanks salem, i know that i need to call wait() ... but this is not the point of interest.

just to mention, i resolve the child zombie thing by calling sigaction() and setting SA_NOCLDWAIT (only for 2.6 kernels)

What i really find to be my problem is that I lose control of my child process.

I need to find a way to kill my child and ALL of its descendants, even if my child has already exited and thus all its children got adopted by 'init'

I read something about this might be possible using process groups.