Thread: Could Windows suck any more than it does?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    C++まいる!Cをこわせ!
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Inside my computer
    Posts
    24,654
    Yeah, compiling stuff because y'know, everyone thinks they should make libraries for Linux instead of both Linux/Windows. Some companies also think they should put synthesis tools on Linux instead of Windows. Another reason I've used Linux.

    It also typically involves downloading archives and unpacking them. And that, in my limited experience, tend to be a pain too since few file managers tend be "good" in my experience, compared to what I'm used to on Windows.
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

  2. #2
    Make Fortran great again
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,413
    Quote Originally Posted by Elysia View Post
    Yeah, compiling stuff because y'know, everyone thinks they should make libraries for Linux instead of both Linux/Windows. Some companies also think they should put synthesis tools on Linux instead of Windows. Another reason I've used Linux.

    It also typically involves downloading archives and unpacking them. And that, in my limited experience, tend to be a pain too since few file managers tend be "good" in my experience, compared to what I'm used to on Windows.
    Kind of like everyone thinks they should only make applications for Windows instead of both Linux/Windows? To be fair though, kudos to the companies who have gone cross-platform. MathWorks, for one, has a Linux version of MATLAB.

    Regarding archive extraction: File Roller is good but can be annoying because you might have to install the supporting unpacking application (for example, p7zip for 7z) depending on what kind of archive you're working with. Most distros come with all the common ones pre-installed now though.

  3. #3
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Quote Originally Posted by Elysia View Post
    everyone thinks they should make libraries for Linux instead of both Linux/Windows.
    There's nothing to discuss here. You don't want to acknowledge the tremendous and much larger amount of software that is being done windows-exclusive, or you'll dismiss it "companies have costs", while at the same time you charge Linux developers working on their free time as not being responsible enough to cater to your windows needs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Elysia View Post
    few file managers tend be "good" in my experience, compared to what I'm used to on Windows.
    The reason why I dislike talking with about Linux with you is exactly on how easily you throw the word "experience" around. It's meaning completely lost to you. And your constant refusal to admit that you don't hold sufficient knowledge to trade blows on equal terms with those arguing with you. People working with both operating systems on a professional or hobbyist capacity for years have a lot to teach you. And yet you refuse it on a continuous basis, probably because you confuse teaching with indoctrination. Very likely you fear both. I tried to warn you about the differences between an ignorant and an idiot. But I think that flew over your head.

    Most people will simply ignore you, or quickly address any finer points and move on, largely uncaring of your unfounded opinions. I can't because of my stupid weaknesses; my desire for confrontation and a profound distaste for human idiocy, that I can't seem to be able to shake of and that I consider one of the roots of all that is wrong about humanity. But rest assured, seemingly contrary to you, I care about my flaws and my weaknesses. It wouldn't take me so long to adopt the position of so many other people concerning your opinions if I weren't an even bigger idiot than you.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  4. #4
    C++まいる!Cをこわせ!
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Inside my computer
    Posts
    24,654
    Hi Mario F., you jerk.

    Apparently the meaning of experience is lost on you, as well. My experience differs from others, and I can only draw conclusions from my own experience. It's not like your experience sits in my head.

    I already admitted: I don't know enough about Linux to argue. People could probably teach me a lot, this has dawned of me. Really. But I'm not going to argue, because it leads nowhere except people like you complaining that I'm ignorant, my experience means nothing, and that the way I like to live and do things is "stupid", and so on. Well, screw you.
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. I am new to C and I suck. Help me?
    By neveslave in forum C Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-20-2010, 06:31 PM
  2. Help please I still suck
    By face_master in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-02-2002, 08:56 AM
  3. you suck!
    By ygfperson in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-15-2002, 09:46 AM

Tags for this Thread