Thread: C++ or C#?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    C++まいる!Cをこわせ!
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Inside my computer
    Posts
    24,654
    Quote Originally Posted by Elkvis View Post
    you don't need Wine to play any video game that matters. Minecraft runs just fine on linux with java. No Wine required.
    Come on! We all know Minecraft is awful and that Terraria rocks! You don't need to be modest =)
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

  2. #2
    Master Apprentice phantomotap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    O_o

    Are you two kidding?

    "Drawrf Fortress" crushes both with a massive payload of awesome.

    Soma
    “Salem Was Wrong!” -- Pedant Necromancer
    “Four isn't random!” -- Gibbering Mouther

  3. #3
    C++まいる!Cをこわせ!
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Inside my computer
    Posts
    24,654
    Quote Originally Posted by phantomotap View Post
    Are you two kidding?

    "Drawrf Fortress" crushes both with a massive payload of awesome.
    Kidding? Why would I be kidding?
    I know nothing about this "Drawrf Fortress" of yours, but I simply implied that Terraria > Minecraft. That doesn't meant there is no ??? > Terraria > ??? > Minecraft.
    Last edited by Elysia; 05-02-2014 at 02:19 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

  4. #4
    Devil's Advocate SlyMaelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Out of scope
    Posts
    4,079
    Quote Originally Posted by Elysia View Post
    That doesn't meant there is no ??? > Terraria > ??? > Minecraft.
    Your revised inequality seems to suggest that Minecraft is definitively the worst of its category.
    Sent from my iPad®

  5. #5
    C++まいる!Cをこわせ!
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Inside my computer
    Posts
    24,654
    Quote Originally Posted by SlyMaelstrom View Post
    Your revised inequality seems to suggest that Minecraft is definitively the worst of its category.
    I disagree with you. There are games far worse than Minecraft (I'm not fan of Minecraft, but it doesn't mean I think it's bad).
    So another revised inequality for you:
    ??? > Terraria > ??? > Minecraft > ???
    Better?
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

  6. #6
    Unregistered User Yarin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,158
    Quote Originally Posted by Elysia View Post
    So another revised inequality for you:
    ??? > Terraria > ??? > Minecraft > ???
    Better?
    I'll revise it for you again:

    x¹ ≥ Terraria ≥ x² > x³ ≥ Minecraft ≥ x⁴

    (although IMHO, Mincraft > Terraria)

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,815
    Just when I thought this thread could not stoop any lower, it turns from zealotry/bigotry concerning programming language (which is bad enough) into zealotry/bigotry concerning games.
    Right 98% of the time, and don't care about the other 3%.

    If I seem grumpy or unhelpful in reply to you, or tell you you need to demonstrate more effort before you can expect help, it is likely you deserve it. Suck it up, Buttercup, and read this, this, and this before posting again.

  8. #8
    Unregistered User Yarin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,158
    Quote Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
    Just when I thought this thread could not stoop any lower ...
    Considering this thread has not (yet?) devolved into a series of ad hominem attacks, I'd say it's better than the average Internet discourse.

  9. #9
    Master Apprentice phantomotap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    Just when I thought this thread could not stoop any lower, it turns from zealotry/bigotry concerning programming language (which is bad enough) into zealotry/bigotry concerning games.
    O_o

    Yeah, and every disagreement is a flame war...

    Soma
    “Salem Was Wrong!” -- Pedant Necromancer
    “Four isn't random!” -- Gibbering Mouther

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,815
    Quote Originally Posted by phantomotap View Post
    Yeah, and every disagreement is a flame war...
    I disagree with you.
    Right 98% of the time, and don't care about the other 3%.

    If I seem grumpy or unhelpful in reply to you, or tell you you need to demonstrate more effort before you can expect help, it is likely you deserve it. Suck it up, Buttercup, and read this, this, and this before posting again.

  11. #11
    Registered User MutantJohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    2,665
    Oh, don't mind grumpy, he's just being, well, a tad grumpy.

  12. #12
    Master Apprentice phantomotap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    x¹ ≥ Terraria ≥ x² > x³ ≥ Minecraft ≥ x⁴
    O_o

    You crazy. x² is obviously superior to x¹.

    Soma
    “Salem Was Wrong!” -- Pedant Necromancer
    “Four isn't random!” -- Gibbering Mouther

  13. #13
    Unregistered User Yarin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,158
    Quote Originally Posted by phantomotap View Post
    You crazy. x² is obviously superior to x¹.
    x¹ and x² are free variables, so by definition it is not.

  14. #14
    C++まいる!Cをこわせ!
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Inside my computer
    Posts
    24,654
    Quote Originally Posted by Yarin View Post
    x¹ and x² are free variables, so by definition it is not.
    o_O
    There is only one variable: x. If such is the case, the it holds that x² > x¹.
    We're not talking about indexes here! We're talking about powers!
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

  15. #15
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Quote Originally Posted by Elysia View Post
    o_O
    There is only one variable: x. If such is the case, the it holds that x² > x¹.
    We're not talking about indexes here! We're talking about powers!
    And power is a fickle thing. What happens if x = 1/4?
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed