Originally Posted by
Epy
Not being argumentative here, just really want to know the truth -- is this a fair comparison? It's my understanding and personal experience that Wine is missing a LOT of functionality. A lot of programs don't work or otherwise I'd never touch Windows ever again. Like, unless someone has taken the time to get a specific program to work, there's like 50% chance it won't work. I was under the impression that Mono had a lot of stuff implemented and does a pretty good job compatibility-wise (I have no experience with this, just hearsay). I looked it up and they've implemented all of .NET 2.0 but are still working on stuff past that.