No you don't. I have never heard anyone EVER say "pointer to five". We have a pointer to an int, not a pointer to five. No one says "pointer to five". You could even say "pointer to myvar", but you would never say "pointer to <value myvar has>". No one does that.No it isn't. A pointer has to have a type associated, because the value of the memory address by itself tells us nothing (which is why you are forced to typecast void* when you want to dereference it.Wrong again. A NULL pointer is specifically set to be a value to test against so you can know you have set a pointer to be "invalid". It doesn't actually have to be &0 by the way.Like I said, no one says that.
Quzah.