Thread: Firefox 5 (Mozilla Release Strategy)

  1. #1
    Master Apprentice phantomotap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,108

    Firefox 5 (Mozilla Release Strategy)

    I got to say, I'm not happy with the new bizarre release strategy of Mozilla relating to "Firefox", but wow is "Firefox" version 5 working really well so far.

    Every site I used to visit that had great bandwidth on its own but had slow sponsored advertisements without fixed form is now loading crazy fast.

    Soma

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    412
    I haven't tried it myself yet, but everyone who has whom I talked to says it's has a big performance increase over ff4
    And about the major version bump; I think they are trying to appeal to the masses of mindless sheep using the "chrome strategy" I've actually heard plenty of people say something like
    -Wow, chrome must be really good! They update the browser really fast!

    What I don't like though is that they aren't doing security updates for ff4 anymore. And it's only been out for, what, a month or two?
    Last edited by _Mike; 06-23-2011 at 05:37 PM.

  3. #3
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Didn't they say FF4 was a big performance increase over FF3? Two of the most praised versions of FF. Bet FF6 users will hate FF5. And FF7 users will make jokes about FF6... and... ad nauseam.

    Anyways, the release cycle... put an end of any hope of Firefox ever entering the corporate market and put Firefox toe-to-toe with Chrome, making now possible all and any comparisons between both products. My opinion: That's a battle FF can't win. And from here on it will be all downhill. I jumped out before I get hurt.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  4. #4
    Lurking whiteflags's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    9,612
    Chrome is changing the browser market more than it should be able to.

  5. #5
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Not without help from those who should be competing with it.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  6. #6
    C++ Witch laserlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    28,413
    I think that they should have just gone with 4.5 instead of 5, following established Firefox tradition post 1.0, heh. (Wait, there was the aberration that was 3.6!)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bjarne Stroustrup (2000-10-14)
    I get maybe two dozen requests for help with some sort of programming or design problem every day. Most have more sense than to send me hundreds of lines of code. If they do, I ask them to find the smallest example that exhibits the problem and send me that. Mostly, they then find the error themselves. "Finding the smallest program that demonstrates the error" is a powerful debugging tool.
    Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    9,547
    They have a strategy?

    Who knew...

  8. #8
    C++ Witch laserlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    28,413
    Come to think of it, 3.6 should have been 4.0, 4.0 should have been 4.5, so 5.0 is apt. All they need to do now is scrap any plans to call 5.5 6.0.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bjarne Stroustrup (2000-10-14)
    I get maybe two dozen requests for help with some sort of programming or design problem every day. Most have more sense than to send me hundreds of lines of code. If they do, I ask them to find the smallest example that exhibits the problem and send me that. Mostly, they then find the error themselves. "Finding the smallest program that demonstrates the error" is a powerful debugging tool.
    Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

  9. #9
    Master Apprentice phantomotap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    O_o

    Was there a "2.5"?

    Soma

  10. #10
    C++ Witch laserlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    28,413
    Noooo....!
    Quote Originally Posted by Bjarne Stroustrup (2000-10-14)
    I get maybe two dozen requests for help with some sort of programming or design problem every day. Most have more sense than to send me hundreds of lines of code. If they do, I ask them to find the smallest example that exhibits the problem and send me that. Mostly, they then find the error themselves. "Finding the smallest program that demonstrates the error" is a powerful debugging tool.
    Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

  11. #11
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    1.5, for what its worth.

    You were saying something about tradition...
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  12. #12
    Master Apprentice phantomotap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    Noooo....!
    Do I see laserlight with the "Fffffffuuuuu" face? ^_^;

    Soma

  13. #13
    Registered User kryptkat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    638
    ff5 has too many bugs that are not resolved. that should have been resolved way before they put anything out as the next ff. for example the "submit crash report" always now stays on in ff5. i fixed it by adding "Crash Reporter" then the value of "0" for the data now it stays off purrrmentaltly. honestly think the crash reporter should be removed and that will boost performance. uther wize i hast seen no increase in speed over ff3.6.16

  14. #14
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Quote Originally Posted by kryptkat View Post
    ff5 has too many bugs that are not resolved. that should have been resolved way before they put anything out as the next ff.
    8 years in a programming forum and you still don't kno how the development process works?
    What have you been doing all this time? Throwing cats?
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  15. #15
    Unregistered User Yarin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,158
    uther wize

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Mozilla EULA
    By Mario F. in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-17-2008, 12:43 PM
  2. gtk mozilla api
    By rabby in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-26-2007, 08:15 PM
  3. Mozilla
    By KneeGrow in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-14-2004, 05:55 PM
  4. Another Mozilla problem
    By face_master in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-28-2003, 04:26 PM