Quote Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
The climatologists do appear to be on the ropes at this time. And I agree that what they continue to assert no one is questioning but what they are failing to point out (that any opposition was quelled without debate) is what everyone is asking about. If it can be proven they indeed engaged in subterfuge to quiet those that were seeking answers or questioning their theories/results or hypothesis then how can we trust any of them on other matters?
I say we can't b/c they have proven a complete disregard for any kind of opposition and in some ways seem very egotistic to me as to not have enough time to actually discuss their theories and findings with underlings who question them. That fact alone is quite scary.
Hmm, you say "any opposition was quelled without debate" and the rest of your post follows along this assumption, but that is far from the truth. Plenty of alternate theories and studies have been printed and discussed.

And again, you appear to be viewing their actions through your own lens without leaving room for other possible explanations. Can you not see how someone who believes so strongly in the accuracy of their findings and who believes strongly in the dishonesty of those skeptical of their findings that such behavior could occur without malicious intent?