Thread: a boy come from china

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    8,446
    Quote Originally Posted by mike_g View Post
    Abachler knows f* all, c'mon, he can't even post a linked list w/o bugs in it, let alone understand pinyin, or even...
    Because he doesn't have to. It's pretty much an unspoken agreement on a discussion of this nature that a link serves only as a starting point for debate. Anyone wishing to follow on the debate should do their own research too if they find the links unsatisfactory or feel they need to learn more or better support their claims.

    But moving on... what bothers me more about your comment is this:

    Quote Originally Posted by mike_g
    Ok, I just read the one child policy link, and it says that it is estimated to have prevented 250,000,000 births [...] Once a population reaches an intolerable limit wars break out and people get killed. Killing people is just plain cruel, and wars bring instability, so its much more sensible to avoid the situation. IMHO, stupid people need brute force natural selection to guide thier race (there are still a few countries that rely on this).
    On this thread alone twice, coming from two different people I have heard the argument that the end justifies the means. Twice!

    And you are not alone. Lately I've seen this (or maybe it has been happening for sometime but only recently I have been paying attention) happening a little all over the news, politicians, commentators, opinion makers.

    It's a revolting thought. Throw up material, even. It's an attack on everything we believe or should believe to be basic human rights. The idea that personal freedoms should be withhold in the name of a "common good" which has no way of being validated is only possible if it comes from the mind of someone who doesn't truly appreciate the gift given to them by 200 years of a struggle for freedom. Someone who takes it for granted and doesn't even made an effort to study the causes and effects of modern tyrannies.

    Meanwhile, what you conveniently didn't mention in your post was the most grave reasons behind the criticism of the One Child Policy like forced abortions, sterilization, social ostracism, or economical segregation. All well documented by several Humans Rights Organizations. And that's precisely the tyranny tactics: To hide the harsher reality to justify oppression. All in the name of a certain common good of arguable validity.
    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  2. #2
    Dr Dipshi++ mike_g's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    On me hyperplane
    Posts
    1,218
    Meanwhile, what you conveniently didn't mention in your post was the most grave reasons behind the criticism of the One Child Policy like forced abortions, sterilization, social ostracism, or economical segregation. All well documented by several Humans Rights Organizations. And that's precisely the tyranny tactics: To hide the harsher reality to justify oppression. All in the name of a certain common good of arguable validity.
    You know, I don't really care about those things when theres millions of people making dumb babies. In short: preventing babies is better than killing people. The world has limited resources and it can't support unbounded growth. Sterilization is a good thing, everyone should get it. Clever people could then be licensed to produce babies. The way I see it, the gene pool is going a bit far in exploration mode, and not producing enough useful results. Where I am you can make a lot of money in benefits out of sitting on your ass making as many babies as possible. Anyway, I see humans are pollution making parasites that need to be controlled somehow. do you have any idea how much destruction we are causing? Do you think it will be sustainable for an exponentially increasing population? Maybe you don't realise it yet, but people in China probably do. Why would the 1 baby policy be so popular over there? I'd guess its because they can directly see the effects of over population. Animals go through the boom and die cycles, but with conscious action we should not have to. It would be nothing but unnecessary suffering.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. strcmp returning 1...
    By Axel in forum C Programming
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-08-2006, 07:48 PM
  2. War with China
    By nickname_changed in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 92
    Last Post: 08-18-2005, 12:31 PM
  3. A China Dilema, waiting for your opinion
    By childem in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 06-14-2004, 12:17 AM
  4. Question about atheists
    By gcn_zelda in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 160
    Last Post: 08-11-2003, 11:50 AM

Tags for this Thread