Thread: Intel Core i7 Processor

  1. #1
    l'Anziano DavidP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Plano, Texas, United States

    Intel Core i7 Processor

    I was just looking at various computers on (since I am in the market for a laptop computer right now), and I came upon this one.

    What puzzled me was the processor's clock speed, which I confirmed here. Of course I am well aware of the fact that the clock speed of a processor is only one of the factors that go into its overall speed and quality (other factors include pipelining, parallelism, caching, out-of-order execution, speculative execution, branch prediction, yada yada yada yada...etc.), but for what purpose did Intel lower the clock speed on this thing when the norm these days is anywhere between 2 and 3 GHz? Is there some amazing improvement in its architecture that they could do that/needed to do that?

    Another Wikipedia article states: "At the time of its release at the Intel Developer Forum on September 23, 2009, Clarksfield processors were significantly faster than any other laptop processor."

    Just wondering.
    My Website

    "Circular logic is good because it is."

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Fewer pipeline stages would be my guess. I'm willing to bet we see more and more CPUs designed this way as power consumption becomes more and more important to users.
    bit∙hub [bit-huhb] n. A source and destination for information.

  3. #3
    Devil's Advocate SlyMaelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Out of scope
    It's lower for three reasons. One, it keeps it cooler, two, it consumes less power, and three, they can now sell processors with the same architecture but higher clock speed for more money. As for the architecture being amazingly improved, yes it is. A 1.6Ghz Core i7 tends to execute the same code faster than a Core 2 Duo would at say 2.4Ghz. So they do it because they can afford to do it while offering the consumer a cooler, cheaper processor.
    Sent from my iPadŽ

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Because they want to make sure the battery life is at least 30 minutes.

    They always do that with laptop processors.

    If a 1.6ghz is $300, a 1.8 will be $400, and a 2.0 $600, just because they can, and people cannot generally overclock laptops.

    For desktop processors it's not as bad because people can just set the clock speed in BIOS.

    That's why I just get a 1.4ghz Core Solo (single core) for my laptop, and 1.8ghz C2D for desktop, overclocked to 3.3ghz.
    Last edited by cyberfish; 10-23-2009 at 02:57 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Inside my computer
    You should keep in mind that usually when you buy a processor, it might run at around 1.3V. IF you overclock 1.8 GHz to 3.3GHz, you would have to run the processor on... say, 1.6V. That is a huge increase in both power consumption and heat generation.
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. couple of questions concerning multi core cpu's
    By Masterx in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-07-2009, 10:39 AM
  2. Intel syntax on MinGW ?
    By TmX in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-06-2007, 09:44 AM
  3. buying a laptop ; intel dual core?
    By BobMcGee123 in forum A Brief History of
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 07-30-2006, 02:28 PM
  4. Is this processor 64-bit?
    By ChadJohnson in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-11-2006, 09:18 AM