View Poll Results: Should purposely misquoting someone be prohibited?

16. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes; It's an infringment on what people say!

    3 18.75%
  • Yes; but only when the reader wouldn't know better.

    3 18.75%
  • I don't care.

    4 25.00%
  • No; just leave it to the moderaters to remove and edit as they see fit.

    4 25.00%
  • No; the quotee shouldn't care!

    2 12.50%

Thread: Should purposely misquoting someone be prohibited?

  1. #16
    spurious conceit MK27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    segmentation fault
    Quote Originally Posted by ennavakillesal View Post
    how the ........ is this supposed to be funny?
    It's not. That part was taken out.


    [More spam testing I see.]*

    *ennavakillesal is including email addresses so they can check if their bots are able to pull addresses from posts for the purpose of spamming.
    Last edited by MK27; 10-14-2009 at 09:25 AM.
    C programming resources:
    GNU C Function and Macro Index -- glibc reference manual
    The C Book -- nice online learner guide
    Current ISO draft standard
    CCAN -- new CPAN like open source library repository
    3 (different) GNU debugger tutorials: #1 -- #2 -- #3
    cpwiki -- our wiki on sourceforge

  2. #17
    Unregistered User Yarin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    I don't get it either.
    As a rule of thumb, it may be a good idea to keep post #2 free of dots.
    I just want to use my computer in a productive manner, not learn how to use it. Elysia
    A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God. Alan Jay Perlis

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed