>Because you're mocking an idea without understanding.
I don't think your idea is especially difficult to understand. In fact, suggesting that it's being rejected without understanding is rather arrogant, because you imply that we're unable to understand something simple.
>If you declined an idea in a meeting without any prior knowledge or understanding, and
>because you generally don't like the idea for no particular reason, you'd look a little silly.
And if you assume that your idea is being declined due to lack of prior knowledge or understanding without any proof, you'll look a very silly when proven wrong. Speaking of which, we've been through this before. The C# forum exists because somebody suggested it on a whim and managed to convince enough powerful people that it was a good idea. Now we have a C# forum that's inactive, pathetic, and essentially worthless compared to other C# forums on the web. After a few years it's still like this, so keep in mind that we're already biased against frivolous forums.
So yes, we understand in full what your idea entails, probably better than you do because your idea is neither new nor unique, and most of us have been around long enough to see the idea get thrown around several times and get attempted at least once. We have both prior knowledge and understanding born of experience.