The thing is, I don't understand why I should use the "+=" operator like this:
Why not simply use "=" ? If anyone could share this piece of knowledge with me I would be very gratefulCode:myTimer.Tick += new EventHandler(myFunc); //myTimer.Tick = myTimer.Tick + new EventHandler(myFunc);
Why should you use the -> operator when accessing the members of an object through a pointer in C++?Then again, unsubscribing by creating a new object...yeah, it really doesn't make any sort of sense.Code:myTimer.Tick += new EventHandler(myFunc); //subscribe to Tick event myTimer.Tick -= new EventHandler(myFunc); //unsubscribe from Tick event
If I did your homework for you, then you might pass your class without learning how to write a program like this. Then you might graduate and get your degree without learning how to write a program like this. You might become a professional programmer without knowing how to write a program like this. Someday you might work on a project with me without knowing how to write a program like this. Then I would have to do you serious bodily harm. - Jack Klein
One word: Microsoft.
Woop?
So Microsoft is the answer to this question ..
Then it has nothing to do with what the operator is usually used for? I mean like this n += a is the same as n = n + a.
Anyway, thank you both for replying.
Last edited by antex; 05-29-2006 at 08:40 AM.
It goes without saying that .....to save memory .
I'm a vietnamese I hope everybody will understant it .
