I'm writing a String class for a school assignment.
The String class is supposed to include a char* pCh pointer to a character array to store the actual string, this is OK.
Then the teacher asked us to include an operator overloading for char* so that every time the compiler can treat a String object as a character pointer it would get access to the char* pCh pointer in the object... other than feeling this breaks encapsulation, I believe it's OK... after all he is the teacher.
This is my implementation of that:
The problem arises when the teacher asks us to include another operator overload, this time for the  operator... as to provide direct access to each of the strings characters... again... encapsulation issues, but that's not the problem...
String :: operator char*() const
This is my implementation if THAT:
Everything seems fine so far?
char& String :: operator(unsigned int i) const
if(i >= length)
The problem is that when trying to actually test my program, the compiler doesn't know what to do... should it first use the operator char* overload on the String and then treat the following [i] the same way any pointer can be accessed (e.g. int* p; int a = p; ) or use my operator(usigned int i) and correctly return a reference to a character???
How do I tell the compiler that I mean the operator? Is there a way to set a presedence order telling the compiler that in the case that a string object is followed by [i] use the correct operator overloading function?
char m = a;
supposed to make char m contain the actual 'm' character in position 1 in string a