Let's say I have a class
within it I have an operationCode:template <class T> SomeClass{};
but if the function get's pretty big is there a way to pull it out the actual class declaration but still have it within the header and qualify all the typenames like soCode:doSomething(T param);
is this at all possible, simply for neatness.Code:template <class T> SomeClass { public: doSomething(T param); }; //this is where the actual definition of doSomething goes
Yes, but it can get rather cryptic because you need to redeclare the template arguments:
Code:template <class T> SomeClass { public: void doSomething(T param); }; template <class T> void SomeClass<T>::doSomething(T param) { // Blah blah }
My best code is written with the delete key.
that's cool.
I'm getting errors like, "request for member `push' in `aStack', which is of non-class type `Stack<int> ()()'"
when I try to use it with a parameter. I've already declared the Stack class with the template parameter of the same type I'm trying to use the member function for.
bah, I guess you aren't supposed to initialize a template class using the parenthesis if the constructor has no parameters.
