completely
completely
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
You've broken encapsulation for all of us?b@stArD! You gonna fix it??
You should see me break inheritance. I'm master at that. I need a less thick skull
EDIT: I mean polymorphism... I do need that skull
Last edited by Mario F.; 08-04-2006 at 07:39 PM.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
It is actually possible to emulate properties using proxy objects, but it's not particularly useful, and they don't behave exactly like public member variables.
All the buzzt!
CornedBee
"There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
- Flon's Law
>A tendency towards monolithic classes is not a direct result of refraining from exposing internals.
No, it's the direct result of the tendency to make everything a member, which is precisely what I was referring to and what you seemed to be suggesting.
My best code is written with the delete key.
