at last!
Isn't that what I told him in the first place?
at last!
Isn't that what I told him in the first place?
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
You ought to read more. I quoted exactly what I didn't understand.Originally Posted by Mario F.
"change the strings where the editor reacts on of the reserved words"
Now what does that sound like to you? To me it says "how can I change the words that the compiler uses as keywords". Everything I've posted thus far has been in regards to that question.
I'm not sure he'll be satisfied with the results as I don't even know that is what he was asking in the first place. In any sense, you yourself said:which, I also replied to saying you can't do.
Sent from my iPadŽ
Well code blocks allows him to change those strings.
Why? Exactly because some people prefer to have their defines based on reserved words color coded like a reserved word. Also because some people like to have their classes (user-defined objects as I said earlier) color coded like their reserved words.
Usually the procedure is not to delete from the list of reserved words, but instead add to it. But basically it's a matter of preference.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
It's hard for me to explain but I think I would have the best result to change the Reserved Words, but Mario F. tolled me there were hard coded, so I think I'm stuck.
Yes. You can't do that on dev-c++. You can on CodeClocks.
And I'm done with this thread.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
