yeah, that would work in most cases
but I still need to know if it's possible to use have a define inside of a macro
what i want to do is something like this
#define macro(text)
_#define Blah array
_text
_#undefine Blah
_#define Blah array2
_text
that way i can do something like this
int x;
macro({
for(x=1; x<Blah[0]; x++) Blah[x] *=2;
somefunc(Blah[0]);
}) //yes, this does work, ive tried it already
without the macro I'd have to type it twice or put an extra load on the processor to loop it and change a pointer
what im actually doing is trying to optimize the code for an rpg battle system that im writing, and i found that i was writing most code twice
also, what do i do to specify a 2nd argument for a macro? would the above code still work with a 2nd argument if i had a , in there somewhere for some reason?
