Thread: Building an array of ints

^ isn't the power operator, it's the bitwise exclusive-or operator.

^ isn't a power operator, it means bitwise exclusive-OR. I don't think XOR was what you wanted, so look into the pow function from <cmath>.

Code:

#include <cmath>

std::pow(x, y); // x to the yth power

Code:

int list1[a.length()^2/2];

Keep in mind that this isn't standard C++. An array in C++ can only have a constant integral size; your size isn't constant, so the code may not work on other compilers. The standard way to do it is

Code:

int *list1 = new int[std::pow(a.length(), 2.0) / 2];

But then you need to remember to free the memory because it won't be released automatically.

Code:

delete [] list1;

Even better would be a standard vector object:

Code:

#include <vector>

std::vector<int> list1(std::pow(a.length(), 2.0) / 2);

Code:

int list1[a.length()^2/2];

Even if it were the power-of operator, division would likely get a higher precedence, so they'd end up with:

Code:

int list1[a.length()^0];

Which would give them:

Code:

int list1[1];

Which really wouldn't be what they wanted.

Quzah.

>>Even if it were the power-of operator, division would likely get a higher precedence, so they'd end up with

Since when does 2/2=0?

Originally Posted by quzah

Even if it were the power-of operator, division would likely get a higher precedence

^ has a higher precedance than * in math. On my TI82 calculator: 3^2/2 gives 4.5, not 3.

Remember the order of operations, PEMDAS?
Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally

Parentheses Exponents Multiplication Division Addition Subtraction

Remember that C++ has its own operator precedence: http://www.cppreference.com/operator_precedence.html


This means that even if you wrote your own number class and implemented ^ as the exponential operator, then Quzah's demonstration would be correct... Well, hopefully it would divide correctly, but other than that, it'd follow Quzah's demonstration.

if you wrote your own number class and implemented ^ as the exponential operator

Yes, *IF*. But ^ is not the exponential operator so it would be wrong. It's like overloading - as the multiplication operator and claiming that "2 times 3 plus 1" is 0 instead of 7.

Originally Posted by JaWiB

>>Even if it were the power-of operator, division would likely get a higher precedence, so they'd end up with

Since when does 2/2=0?

Yeah... well about that... There was this thread about integer division...no, I won't go there again. (For a while anyway.)

Oh, wait! I overloaded the division operator to to modulus! That's it!

Quzah.

I appreciate all the help and replies so far, but I've got another related question (of course )

Edit: Answered my own question.