Thread: Getting Borland's C++ Builder to work with the ANSI standard.

  1. #16
    Hardware Engineer
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    1,398

    To clarify my previous post...

    I wasn't aware that this isn't capable of building simple, non windos programs
    "Hello World" is a console type program and I believe that you can compile console programs with Borland C++ Builder.

    I searched-around Borland's web site a little, and was able to confirm that version 5 could build console applications... I'll bet this feature is still in Builder 6.

    Just to add to the confusion... "Hello World" compiled as a console application (with a windows compiler), will appear to be a DOS program when you run it on a Windows system, but the resulting 32 bit exe will not run under 16 bit true-DOS.

  2. #17
    Utter insanity
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    19
    "But you use a compiler that only runs on windows, meaning your OS must also be windows "

    Name an modern OS that has the same market share as WinXP. iMac? Linux? Pretty much everything is produced for Windows; not either of those; and whats been ported you have to order online; you can't just got to Best Buy and pick it up. Pretty much if you want to do anything; your stuck with Windows. It's called a monopoly. No viable alternatives. If I could; I'd just use my C128 for everything; I can access the internet with a 56k modem. Since most of my time online is spent at message boards such as this; and finding out obscure facts; it'd work just as well as my cable. And it wouldn't crash every 5 seconds.

    On my problem; IE is pulling it's usual; and I haven't gotten one of the freeware jobs yet. If it will work long enough; I'd also d/l a decent browser; if one can be found.
    "I merely took the energy it takes to pout and wrote some blues." - Duke Ellington

  3. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2
    Pretty much if you want to do anything; your stuck with Windows.
    You want to do programming right? Guess what, Linux distros usually come with g++, a C++ compiler that is good in ANSI compliance.

  4. #19
    Banned nickname_changed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    986
    Version 6.0 of Borland C++ Builder can still build console apps. File->New and I think its named "Console Application" if memory serves me correctly.

    >>It's called a monopoly.
    Is that the reason why you try to avoid their products? Just because they have a large market share?

    Personally I think the fact that Microsoft has such a monopoly in the desktop is not good for the IT market, as it does make it harder for fair competition. But thats no reason not to use MS products. Sure, they may be a big mean monopoly, but that does not mean they don't create good software, and its no reason to avoid their software. Microsofts doesn't owe its dominance all to marketting as some people seem to think, although it does help. They also do produce good software, and they take care of their developers. Oh sure windows crashes a little more often than Linux. Boo $$$$ing hoo. Lets see you create something better.

    Note: My anti-anti-microsoft talk above was not aimed at you domhnall4h, but at the people out there who ponce around claiming Microsoft suck and we should all use linux.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Bug in iterator comparison in C++ standard?
    By steev in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-12-2008, 12:02 AM
  2. Why does <conio.h> not work on my Mac? Non ANSI?
    By tvsinesperanto in forum C Programming
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-17-2006, 07:04 PM
  3. Abstract Base Class and References
    By Thantos in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-13-2004, 01:35 PM
  4. The Bludstayne Open Works License
    By frenchfry164 in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-26-2003, 11:05 AM
  5. fopen();
    By GanglyLamb in forum C Programming
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-03-2002, 12:39 PM