Thread: c++ or c ?

quick question, would this code be considered fully c++ or fully c? I've never learned c, but I believe that sscanf (c) is similar to cin (c++), but I'm not sure....

Code:

ifstream examplefile(argv[1]); //open a file indicated by the single command
                                   //line argument
    if (! examplefile.is_open())
    { 
       cout << "Error opening file"; exit (1);
    } 
    examplefile.getline (buffer,100);
    sscanf(buffer,"%d", &line);
    cout << line << endl;
    for (i=1; i<=line; i++)
    {
       examplefile.getline (buffer,100);
       sscanf(buffer, "%d, %d", &con1, &con2);
       cout << con1 << "," << con2 << endl;
    }

thanks, axon

Technically full C++ as elad said. Practically, I'd call it a mix of the two, though.

Originally posted by Bubba
In reality pure C++ is quite ugly. Most use a mixture of the two which is why we all love this C/C++ world.

I tend to disagree, I almost never include any of the c header files in any of my programming. Pure C++ can look quite elegant when properly written.

I don't passionately avoid C, but I tend to use the newer ways to do things.

^ you don't even use C-style strings?

I usually try to steer clear of C. I like the STL containers and the string class more than C-style strings. I like cout and cin better than scanf and printf. I like new and delete better than malloc and free. I like every improvement over C, so I use those nice features of C++.

well, I do have to say I use mostly C++, but that's because I never learned C... some C is helpful, but I don't think I'll go back and learn anytime soon because 1) every book i've read says not to, and 2) I'm going to learn different languages first...