In a class definition, what line of code would create a default constructor to initialize the two parameters (fltNum and fltMiles) of class Flight to 0 for both values?
Any insights on what I think it is…Code:class Flight { // The default constructor Flight() { fltNum = fltMiles = 0; }; //... }; // end class Flight
Thanks
edit: Or perhaps the default constructor doesn't need to be public. I'm not sure... I always make it public at least.Code:class Flight { public: // The default constructor Flight() { fltNum = fltMiles = 0; }; //... }; // end class Flight
Last edited by confuted; 08-07-2003 at 09:58 PM.
Away.
This sounds like homework. So a little hint:
>>In a class definition, what line of code would create a default constructor
The default constructor for a class named "Flight" must be named "Flight", and must not be passed any arguments. You already have such a constructor defined.
>>to initialize the two parameters (fltNum and fltMiles)
The constructor is just like any other function, except that it is called automatically when an instance of the class is created. You already have the lines inside the constructor that will initialise them both to 0.
If it didnt look like it was formatted by a blind monkey, that might help too...
Code:class Flight { public: // The default constructor Flight() { fltNum = fltMiles = 0; }; //... }; // end class Flight
"There's always another way"
-lightatdawn (lightatdawn.cprogramming.com)
Not true. This is also a default constructor, which is passed two arguments:Originally posted by lightatdawn
The default constructor for a class named "Flight" must be named "Flight", and must not be passed any arguments.
A default constructor either takes no arguments, or supplies default values for every argument.Code:class Point{ public: Point(int x = 0, int y = 0); /* Rest of class */ };
>>A default constructor either takes no arguments, or supplies default values for every argument.
True. My bad.
"There's always another way"
-lightatdawn (lightatdawn.cprogramming.com)
